Skip to main content

Screen Wars Thought Leader Interviews are also available on

SpotifyApple PodcastGoogle Podcast
Articles

Lessons From The 2022 Georgia Senate Race

By December 22, 2022January 31st, 2023No Comments

Articles

Lessons From The 2022 Georgia Senate Race

With next-generation planning tools like Cross Screen Media’s ScreenImpact, see how we analyzed the close Senate race in Georgia that showed two very different approaches to targeting swing voters.

December 22, 2022

As we’ve said many times before, few do local video advertising better than political campaigns. Every two years, in just a few weeks time, campaigns spend millions of dollars in targeted, local video ads in the hopes of raising awareness, getting out the vote, and ultimately, winning elections.

Cross Screen Media recently took a deep dive into the closely-watched Senate race in Georgia to see how the campaigns for the two main candidates, Herschel Walker and Raphael Warnock, reached swing voters on broadcast TV. Here’s a little of what we were able to discover using our measurement tool, ScreenImpact.

In a polarized political climate, swing voters are most coveted. In Georgia, independents, along with “soft” Republican and Democrat voters who are not strongly tied to their party, total 1.9 million households, 75% of which can be reached via broadcast TV advertising.

Swing Voters in Georgia

Herschel Walker’s Campaign

During the time period we looked at, Herschel Walker’s campaign delivered 34 million ad impressions to swing voters, which had a reach of 53% and an average frequency of 18 impressions per household.

 

The reach and frequency of Walker’s campaign started off slowly and built more rapidly as election day approached.

 

ScreenImpact Highlights

  • Walker’s reach surged during the final week of the campaign.
  • Only one third of swing voters saw Walker’s ad more than 7 times.
  • Total ad impressions were 34 million during this time period. 

 

Raphael Warnock’s Campaign

Warnock’s campaign delivered 118 million ad impressions to swing voters, which had a reach of 63% and an average frequency of 61 impressions per household.

 

The reach and frequency of Warnock’s campaign started off stronger and built steadily as election day approached.

 

ScreenImpact Highlights

  • Warnock’s reach grew steadily throughout the campaign.
  • Over half of swing voters saw Warnock’s ad more than 7 times.
  • Total ad impressions were 118 million during this time period.

Key Takeaways

What can we glean from these two differing approaches?  

Similar Maximum Reach

The maximum potential broadcast reach for this audience was 75%. Warnock was able to reach 63% with his campaign, but Walker’s campaign was more efficient, reaching almost 53% with 3.5x fewer ad impressions.

Huge Differences in Ad Frequency

Warnock’s campaign blanketed swing voters with an average frequency of 61, a number that was almost 3.5x higher than Walker’s average frequency of 18 spots

Does Timing Matter?

Warnock’s campaign started early and saw steady linear growth, while Walker’s campaign jumped to life in mid-October.



Read More…

Download a PDF of these results here.